D 2023

Professional artists and the division of labour, or How not to reproduce inequalities

MOTAL, Jan

Základní údaje

Originální název

Professional artists and the division of labour, or How not to reproduce inequalities

Název anglicky

Professional artists and the division of labour, or How not to reproduce inequalities

Autoři

Vydání

Special Issue 04. Brno, Touching Limits/Crossing Borders od Theatre, 2023

Nakladatel

Divadelní fakulta JAMU

Další údaje

Jazyk

čeština

Typ výsledku

Stať ve sborníku

Obor

60403 Performing arts studies

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Forma vydání

elektronická verze "online"

Odkazy

Organizační jednotka

Divadelní fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

social practice; social transformation; artists; state; labour; public service

Štítky

Změněno: 17. 3. 2024 18:54, doc. MgA. Hana Průchová, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

In late-modern society, art is still a distinct field of human activity, as it developed in the course of the Industrial Revolution along with the diversifying division of labour. Whereas in mass society art could rely on the power of the audience or the support of collective institutions or political parties, today the artist is in the same situation as other precarized industries – like journalists or educators, he or she is undergoing a massive deprofessionalization (expressed in the tabloidization of theatre and media). Artists are therefore seeking the attention and support of the state, which should protect their professional status and recognise their activity as a specific public service. But do we know what this really means? Is it not just a convenient collaboration with the modern state, which is the ultimate manifestation of the modern division of labour that, alongside opportunities, breeds above all – social inequalities? Have not we, as artists, lost our relationship with the people, to whose everyday life all engaged art should be indebted? This anarchistic dialogue between a contemporary engaged artist and a retired avant-garde socialist of the fin-de-siecle offers a dialectical reflection on the relationship between professionalism, art and social practice that seeks social transformation towards a more just and free society.

Anglicky

In late-modern society, art is still a distinct field of human activity, as it developed in the course of the Industrial Revolution along with the diversifying division of labour. Whereas in mass society art could rely on the power of the audience or the support of collective institutions or political parties, today the artist is in the same situation as other precarized industries – like journalists or educators, he or she is undergoing a massive deprofessionalization (expressed in the tabloidization of theatre and media). Artists are therefore seeking the attention and support of the state, which should protect their professional status and recognise their activity as a specific public service. But do we know what this really means? Is it not just a convenient collaboration with the modern state, which is the ultimate manifestation of the modern division of labour that, alongside opportunities, breeds above all – social inequalities? Have not we, as artists, lost our relationship with the people, to whose everyday life all engaged art should be indebted? This anarchistic dialogue between a contemporary engaged artist and a retired avant-garde socialist of the fin-de-siecle offers a dialectical reflection on the relationship between professionalism, art and social practice that seeks social transformation towards a more just and free society.